Theology & Dogma
Filioque Controversy
The words and the Son, added in the Latin West to the Creed’s statement that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father. They appear first in Spain, at Toledo in 589, and spread through the Frankish church; Charlemagne’s theologians pressed for them, and Pope Leo III refused and had the Creed engraved without them on silver shields in St Peter’s. Rome itself began singing them only around 1014. The Orthodox objection is double. On the canonical side, the Creed of an Ecumenical Council was changed by one part of the Church alone, when Ephesus had forbidden any other creed. On the theological side, making the Son a second source of the Spirit undoes the monarchy of the Father and blurs the Persons into their shared essence. St Photius, the council of 879-880 and St Mark of Ephesus each held the line, and it remains one of the questions between the churches.
The text
The clause itself
who proceedeth from the Father
τὸ ἐκ τοῦ Πατρὸς ἐκπορευόμενον
The Latin interpolation
qui ex Patre Filioque procedit
who proceeds from the Father AND THE SON
The whole dispute is one word. The Greek is the conciliar text of 381; the Latin is the interpolated form, which no Ecumenical Council authorised and which Rome itself resisted for centuries before adopting.
Sources
- St. Photius the Great, Mystagogy of the Holy Spirit archive.org, to borrow
- Council of Constantinople (879-880 AD), the Horos
- Third Ecumenical Council (431 AD), Canon 7 the canon, in Greek and English
- St. Mark of Ephesus, the Syllogistic Chapters against the Latins